From: Dagmawi
To: Seble
Subject: If the fourth is a prod, is the fifth a jolt......
Dearest Seble,
"It has been a fortnight since last I penned a note to you, and I have been anxiously awaiting a
response...." Sorry, I momentarily lapsed into an alternate state --- right medium, wrong
exchange.
Greetings. I apologize for the delay in responding to your last message. I have been tied up
(figuratively speaking, that is) in moving my place of abode. This is the fourth or fifth time I
have moved in and out of a place recently and frankly I tire of the ritual!!! The entire experience
got me thinking about the transitory nature of our existence in the Diaspora. To the best of my
recollection, most Ethiopians back home moved at most three times in their entire lives --- when
they married, when they divorced, and when they died. Otherwise, their existence was pretty
much bounded by the perimeter of the house they were born in. There is a certain amount of
stability and continuity to that concept which we have lost since we have emigrated to this
country.
I was delighted to hear that you found my bedside reading material to your liking. Incidentally, I
misspoke when I told you that the subject was outside my usual reading genre --- I should have
added the qualifier "lately", since my reading tastes do tend to be somewhat eclectic (I am
currently reading a novel titled "La Cucina" about the sensual impact of cooking on a large
Italian family --- wonderful book, along the same lines as "Like Water for Chocolate").
Recently, I have not indulged in personal/exploratory reading to the extent that I used to, as my
daily work-related reading (emails, reports, business periodicals) leave me too exhausted to
entertain any thoughts of actually reading for pleasure. I am making a concerted effort, however,
to reestablish my reading ritual, as it is one of the activities which brings me the greatest
pleasures (right up there with wine, women, song, good food,....).
Back to the subject of our last exchange..... You surprised me by taking my statement about the
absence(at least publicly) of Ethiopian sexual deviants of any magnitude in a completely
unexpected direction. I had not really considered the issue of "institutionalized deviancy" (I
don't know if I just coined a phrase --- if so, you have my permission to use it at any of your
social functions as long as you credit me and pay royalties). I suppose one can look at the issues
of female genital mutilation/circumcision, forced/arranged pre-teen marriages, etc. as sexual
deviancy, but I think that would be offering a facile explanation for a very complex phenomena.
As I am sure you are aware, the practice of female circumcision and fixed marriages serve
distinct purposes in the minds of the practitioners (misguided, true, but there nonetheless) ---
chastity in the case of the former, and economic gain in the case of the latter. I do not condone
these practices by any stretch of the imagination, but I believe that it is misguided to believe that
this practice exists due to some overwhelming deviant drive.
From the point of view of the parents, I believe it is an issue of potential economic gain --- the
reality is that a chaste, young wife has more value than one that is not. This is still a harsh
reality in many parts of the world even in the 21st century. From the viewpoint of the older male
who is involved in the transaction (for, base as it sounds, that is really what it is) I assume that he
is compensating for some void or sense of inadequacy by showing the world that he merits a
pure young mate. As you well know, there is much cachet attached to a man's potential to
attract/retain a woman much younger than he is. It is an inevitable by-product of aging in a man,
I suppose, and it is driven by a very strong visceral drive to retain some of the allure of youth.
-- " A woman is a woman until the day she dies, but a man is a man only as long as he can."
Moms Mabley
-- "The shame of aging is not that Desire should fail (who mourns for something he no longer
needs?); it is that someone else must be told." W.H. Auden
I do not believe that there is anything fundamentally wrong with the issue of older man/younger
woman (sounds self-serving, doesn't it?), as long as the woman is of age and comes to the
relationship willingly. Otherwise, if it is forced, I am with you and believe that it is an
abominable practice and tantamount to underage rape. It is, however, more than likely going to
prevail for quite some time due to the economic and social factors surrounding the issue.
In closing, I did give some thought about your theory that some exigency may potentially force
us all "to buy into the same evil franchise". I was hard-pressed to think of any catalyst that
would drive me to such levels of depravity. That is, however, what these same depraved
individuals I am reading about probably felt before they went on their "chopping" spree, so who
is to say.
CAUTION.... FOLLOWING MATERIAL MAY BE CONSTRUED AS POLITICAL IN
NATURE, AND THEREFORE MAY BE EDITED OUT BY EDITORS OR OFFEND THE
READER. PROCEED AT YOUR OWN RISK. [Editors shrug..."hey, nice shrug"]
By the by, you mention that one of your cousins is doing a bio on one of the "famous
revolutionaries of 1974". Fundamentally, I am surprised that she is depressed and shocked by
what she is finding about this individual (I do not who he is, so I am making a general
judgmental statement). The so-called "revolution" of 1974 was fundamentally nothing more than
a coup-d'etat carried out by misguided Western-educated (pseudo-) intellectuals and a cadre of
disgruntled petty military officers. Mind you, I am not totally relieving the pre-1974
government from its share of mistakes, but I am pre-disposed to believe that it was far more
progressive (be it at a snail's pace) than the Derg that replaced it. The PMRC/Derg started out
with highfalutin ideals, serenading the public with military marches and blasting the former
government for its ills and misdeeds, promising change and a rosy future. The Derg quickly
showed its true colors, however, and descended into the abyss of genocidal destruction, the after-effects of which will be felt well into the 21st century. Enough of my stint at "Speakers'
Corner"...... I leave with you a thought...
- "Nothing is clearer in history than the adoption by successful rebels of the methods they were
accustomed to condemning in the forces they deposed." Will and Ariel Durant
... or said another way:
- "Every successful revolution puts on in time the robes of the tyrant it has deposed." Barbara
Tuchman
(Enough with the political diatribe --- you just touched on a pet peeve of mine, and I had to vent.
Thanks for accommodating --- no response required.)
Eagerly awaiting your reply, I remain,
Your dutiful correspondent Dagmawi.
PS: Thanks for the compliment re: writing style. Pedigreed? No, no, it is just a vestige of the
days when I actually used to write real letters--- I enjoyed it so. That style of correspondence is
such a dying art, alas, and has been relegated to the rubbish heap, to be replaced by email, two-way beepers, etc. Such a pity, don't you think???....
D
From: Seble
To: Dagmawi
Subject: You Prod, I Push
Dagmawinetu:
I should quote something by Twain just to show you I can, but… it's 5:00 p.m. and I am drawing
a blank.
Your last entry reminded me of a story though… I was about seven accompanying my mother on
an excursion to Merkato. While she was ardently arguing with some shopkeeper, andu duriyE
slithered past me. "Anchi!" he called out menacingly as all duriyEs do. I turned around.
"Libdash!" he said very matter-of-factly. (Do you know what that does to a bona fide ye'bEt lij?
Infra dignitatem!) After a little debate with myself, I decided my mother should be made privy
to this encounter. I bravely took her aside and told her what that duri-sniff-yE had said to me,
fully expecting an "Ayzosh yenE lij" and/or at least a perfunctory right-left look over her
shoulders for the urchin and an exclamation of "YetiNaw? Ere yet abatu!" in staunch defense of
her daughter. Not my mother. She squinted her eyes at me. What was I doing answering to
"Anchi!"?
So… I'm wondering if I should take your bait and jump into the pool of female genital mutilation
discussion. Ah… what the hell. I have a weakness for guys who can knit.
I often wonder if the world would be a better place, Daggieye, if more women thought like men,
or if more men thought like women. I did delight that you at least allowed that they who practice
female genital mutilation are "misguided". But I can't say I am "misguided" (how fabulously
diplomatic of you…) in thinking that this is not "institutional sexual deviancy." © Dagamwi. ;)
Without getting into a heated back-and-forth on the primal need of men needing younger women
to feel, well, like men… I find the concept of *mutilating* a woman to keep her pure very
interesting.
"Sire… the women of the land… how can we keep them chaste for the men of the land?"
"Don't I pay you people a lot of money so that I don't have to think about these kind of things?"
"Well, we could educate them on the values of chastity…"
"Whatever. As long as my next wife is young and pure."
"Or we could chop off their clits."
"Hmm… But how will that affect *me*?"
"It won't, Sire. It just guarantees that she will not desire another."
"What else?"
"Well, for Sire's extreme sexual satisfaction, we could sew up "the hole" for tighter accommodation."
"Go… start chopping."
And thus, in a land far away, Institutionalized Deviancy began. And in a land further away, two
people far removed from it all, discuss it with dispassion and try to work out the "potential
economic gain" of keeping your daughter chaste and valuable.
At some point, Daggisha, yene geta, does the reason matter? The men in the book you are
reading, if they pointed out horrendous neglected childhoods which lead to their chronicled
debauchery, would you have been as legass in your rationale and say, "The reality is that…"
So… tell me how this is not deviancy again?
>> As you well know, there is much cachet attached to a man's potential to attract/retain a
woman much younger than he is. It is an inevitable by-product of aging in a man, I suppose, and
it is driven by a very strong visceral drive to retain some of the allure of youth.<<
Ahh.. the "How does this affect me?" syndrome again. Soooo cute. And so last century. But still
cute. If only women could be so smitten with it.
Dag, I think I would rather talk about fellatio. Wouldn't you?
I was watching TV last night and came across that annoying commercial for AOL Version 6.0 or
6.02.. whatever. The tag line was something to the effect "So simple it can't get any simpler…
So simple anyone can use it." (Gosh, I would make a terrible copywriter.)
Point being, that there is my life these days. Simple. Exhilaratingly so. Do you remember the
angst of chasing a career, the obsession with 2% body fat, going down the next black double
diamond (huh? We back to fellatio?), the right mutual funds, an apartment on the right side of
town, the right vacation? Where did all of it go? How did all of the addiction to chaos evaporate?
I was so drunk on life in my twenties (thank God) and here I am now, sobering up (thank God). I
am the human version of AOL 6.0. All the kinks worked out.
No longer do I feel fixated with hiding the skeletons of my past. Instead, I find I've wrapped
them in velvet brd libss (just like Elvis) and getting ready to give them proper burial. It is a
beautiful thing, not apologizing for yourself (your failures OR your successes). Dolly Parton said
it well: "Do you know how expensive it is to look this cheap?" It is so complex finding
simplicity.
Life, Dagmawi, is great. Turning 30… did it do that to you?
Nafaqih,
_seble.
p.s. Despite myself, I am enjoying this. Esti dgemeN.
PREV | NEXT
|